Screwed again Costanza...
The Oscars
I am not quite sure what to think about this year’s Academy Awards. Martin Scorsese was slighted yet again, joining Robert Altman and Alfred Hitchcock in the 0 for 5 category for Best Director. There have been far too many snubs and outrages in the Academy…though I know you simply cannot please everyone. Someone will always seemingly get robbed…whether that includes not getting a nomination…or the shiny statue itself.
Still there have been a lot of crazy snubs in the last 10 years or so.
Not necessarily in a particular order...
10) GLADIATOR WINS BEST PICTURE, 2001
In what was already a dismal year, the icing on the cake was that Gladiator, a summer action blockbuster, would win best picture up against movies of greater importance and achievment. Don't get me wrong, I loved Gladiator, but in a year that was sparse in the great movies department, it still had movies like Traffic and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. Even Almost Famous. It showed that the Academy was through with awarding great achievment, instead, more commercial fare...
09) JIM CARREY SNUBBED 2 YEARS IN A ROW (1999, 2000)
Okay, I know, here’s a controversial one. Not many people would argue that Jim Carrey is really that great an actor, and even fewer would argue that he deserved nods for Truman Show or Man on the Moon. First of all, in a time when everyone has gotten at least one nomination, to see Carrey act his heart out, and defy his image, was something that awed me two years in a row. I felt that he at least deserved to be recognized with an Oscar Nomination. And I was outraged come Oscar Nomination Morning, to see his name off the cut two years in a row. This outrage brought to you by the Academy’s lack of voting for people that make more money than they do. Maybe he didnt deserve one for Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, but another terrific performance by a gifted actor nonetheless.
08) MARTIN SCORSESE LOSES BEST DIRECTOR 2 YEARS IN A ROW (2003, 2004)
I know many would disagree with this: mainly those who are not Marty Scorsese fans, and those who were less than fans of Gangs of New York. Well, my personal feelings of the director and his movies aside, I think he should have won last year. Yes, a lot of passion went into making The Pianist by Roman Polanski, and Chicago would have gotten nowhere without its director. But Gangs of New York combined so many of Scorsese’s celebrated styles and located them in a beautiful 19th century New York. Of the movie, I feel it is a mutilated masterpiece…of its direction, undeniably great. I’m outraged that the academy will hand out IOU Oscars left and right, but refuse to award the directors who have given birth to modern cinema: Altman, Kubrick, Hitchcock, and of course, Martin Scorsese. I don't want even get into his loss this year....
07) FORREST GUMP WINS BEST PICTURE IN 1994
Okay, and here's the great twist! I loved Forrest Gump, I own the dvd, it was solid all the way through.. But Pulp Fiction is not only a better film, by far, but also, a far more important film to cinema, its history and future. By now its almost a universally accepted fact that Pulp Fiction is the movie of the '90's, and Quentin Tarantino, the boy wonder who revamped the medium. The academy is so out-of-touch with the times, and what is important, that they almost always give the award to the wrong movie. And fifty years later, when generations look back at what won, they think "what the hell?!?!," and stick with the real best picture of that year: For example..anyone see Chariots of Fire? Or do you think in 50 years people might remember a film called "Raiders of the Lost Ark"?
That said..it seems like I am pulling for Pulp Fiction. And I am. But the award should have gone to Shawshank Redemption. I may be biased, as it is most likely my favorite film of all time! Just watch the special featurette on the new dvd of this film and tell me if it doesn’t convince you..its regarded by most people in the last 10 years or so, as their favorite film. Check out its rating on IMDB
Oh, and by the way..this is almost another entry in the top 10 but The Shawshank Redemption won...ZERO Oscars.
06) THE SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE IN 1999 OUTRAGE
Okay, I thought that Saving Private Ryan should have won, ultimately. At the time of the Oscars, I thought for sure it was going to. I was pleasantly surprised by Shakespeare in Love, and realized how different each movie is, and how similar: one is an important war film, perhaps the most realistic ever made, and the other is one of the most cleverly written romantic comedies in years. Private Ryan is a shockingly graphic film, while Shakespeare is a lighthearted film that is unmanipulating, and genuinely fun. Both are very well directed, acted, filmed, written, and all the rest, making both films worthy of the prize. Even the Academy was split, they honored the technical achievement to Private Ryan with a director Oscar and editing, sound, etc, and gave picture to Shakespeare in Love, along with acting and writing Oscars. Very split...I think the academy admired both films equally. But boy oh boy..go online and search around for oscar outrages..and you'll find 32872334243 websites devoted this controversy. There isnt one. Both were up to the task. You cannot give it to both.
05) FARGO LOSES BEST PICTURE IN 1997
There are a couple of films, like maybe five, that defined the '90's, and Fargo was one of them. It was a groundbreaking film...one that mixed up genre filmmaking just as much as Pulp Fiction. Oh, and the Academy, stupid as they can be, gives the award to, SURPRISE! -- the epic. I'm not arguing the merit of English Patient, yet, why the hell did Fargo lose to that movie!?!?! Why?!?! Fargo is a movie that will be around forever...it's the crowning achievement of two of the most exciting directors working today! This is a move that defines outrage! I can understand if a movie is too quirky, or unconventional for Academy taste, but Fargo is such an appealing and entertaining film, that packs a genuine wallop at the end....
04) RANDY NEWMAN
Now granted, I don't own ANY of his cds or the scores he has written. In fact, all I have is "I love L.A." on mp3, because when the Lakers win a playoff game, I enjoy playing that song...just like they did at the Forum. But Randy Newman NEVER winning an award for Best Original Score, despite God knows how many nominations. One win for an innocuous pop song, that's it, all that's been given to one of Hollywood's finest screen composers.
03) THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING LOSES BEST PICTURE TO A BEAUTIFUL MIND IN 2002
Twenty years from now, people will look back at A Beautiful Mind winning the best picture oscar over FOTR, and not only wonder what the hell "A Beautiful Mind" was, but more importantly, how the hell it won over to the first installment of one of the greatest cinematic achievements in the history of motion picture. It will be as much a bewilderment as Raging Bull losing in 1980. And this isn't because I'm a LOTR fanboy who thinks that these films are the second coming of Citizen Kane...I just happen to be a very strong enthusiast for great movies. I couldn't believe it, that night in March of 2002 when A Beautiful Mind took home the Oscar...What was even more shocking was that Ron Howard got the Director Oscar, over a film like LOTR. Peter Jackson's direction of that film..was brilliant. It's one more example of how bad the Academy is at picking the truly most important film of a given year, they're incapable of it! They're too busy giving out IOU Oscars, and voting for themselves, to actually award the art form...in my opinion, this is one of the worst things that has happened at the Awards Ceremony since I started watching it.
02) TITANIC WINNING ANYTHING IN 1998
Titanic is the only Best Picture winner since 1966 not to get even a Screenplay nomination. What are you doing winning Best Picture if your screenplay can't even be nominated? Come on! Ok, so perhaps it should have won for effects or some other technical awards..it was a masterpiece in that department. But I think the Academy..and most people in general..simply got caught up in the huge media explosion for this film and rode it all the way from the boxoffice to the podium. Let's not forget about a little gem called L.A. Confidential shall we?
01)I am still trying to figure out my number one..any suggestions?
HONORABLE MENTION:
-Adaptation not winning an Oscar for the screenplay (original or adapted, doesnt matter)
-Hoop Dreams not getting a best documentary nomination in 1994 much less a best pic nomination
-Roberto Benigni over Edward Norton for best actor
-Amélie loses Best Foreign Language Film to No Man's Land
-Memento losing best editing
-Denzel Washington loses for Malcom X
-Glory not getting a Best Picture nomination
-Russel Crowe not getting Best Actor for The Insider
-Kim Basinger winning for Best Supporting Actress
-Ralph Fiennes not winning best supporting actor award for Schindler's List
-Julia Roberts winning for Erin Brockovich over Ellen Burstyn for Requiem for a Dream.
Oh..by the way..the single biggest Oscar outrage of the last 10 years is letting Whoopi Goldberg host the show.